IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v35y2020i9p1568-1585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Saving the neighbourhood: understanding tenant activism in middle-class Manhattan

Author

Listed:
  • Michael R. Glass
  • Rachael A. Woldoff
  • Lisa M. Morrison

Abstract

Recent debates question whether assemblage urbanism provides an appropriate framework for addressing the housing question under late capitalism. On one side, proponents note the capacity of assemblage to reveal the complex emergence of events, places and processes, whereas critics argue assemblage accounts provide deep empirical detail but avoid engaging with political economy. This paper addresses such criticism through an assemblage account of local activism in the context of ownership changes that threatened the rent-regulated Stuyvesant Town neighbourhood in Manhattan. We adopt an assemblage methodology to examine this case of privileged tenant activism and find that it provides an additive lens for understanding the networks of relations that influenced the community during the mid-2000s. Noting that assemblage and the financial ecologies approach are similar in their attendance to relational thinking, we describe how these approaches can be used in conjunction to better understand the linkages between housing and financialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael R. Glass & Rachael A. Woldoff & Lisa M. Morrison, 2020. "Saving the neighbourhood: understanding tenant activism in middle-class Manhattan," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 1568-1585, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:35:y:2020:i:9:p:1568-1585
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2019.1693520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2019.1693520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2019.1693520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:35:y:2020:i:9:p:1568-1585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.