IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v76y2024i7p1120-1144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consultative Authoritarianism in Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Knox
  • Dina Sharipova

Abstract

Consultative authoritarianism is associated with regimes that provide mechanisms for citizens’ voice on public policy issues. The existing research considers the implementation of this concept through two mechanisms: civil society working in partnership with the state and public consultation channels that provide opportunities for citizens to influence government decision-making. This study examines consultative authoritarianism in Central Asia. Using a case study of Kazakhstan, a ‘softer’ authoritarian state, we investigate whether the operationalisation of this model fulfils the claims made for it. Through qualitative data gathered from key stakeholders, the study finds mixed evidence of success: there is greater political space for civil society but public consultation mechanisms have limited impact. It is unlikely that either of these changes is sufficient to address the frustrations of citizens and forestall random demonstrations and political protests, which, in turn, may lead to violent repression by the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Knox & Dina Sharipova, 2024. "Consultative Authoritarianism in Central Asia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(7), pages 1120-1144, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:76:y:2024:i:7:p:1120-1144
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2024.2360217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2024.2360217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2024.2360217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:76:y:2024:i:7:p:1120-1144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.