IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v67y2015i6p893-915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an Anti-Japanese Territorial Front? Russia and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dispute

Author

Listed:
  • James D. J. Brown

Abstract

This article examines Russia's position on the Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute. It focuses particularly on the claim that Russia and China are forming an anti-Japanese territorial front. Looking closely at official statements and actions, as well as Russian-language media and scholarship, it finds that Russia, while retaining a position of formal neutrality, clearly considers China's claims more favourably. While this could be seen to have alarming implications by arraying China and Russia on one side against Japan and the USA on the other, the article also finds that Russia's support is not without qualifications and that its place in the conflict is not yet entrenched.

Suggested Citation

  • James D. J. Brown, 2015. "Towards an Anti-Japanese Territorial Front? Russia and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dispute," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(6), pages 893-915, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:67:y:2015:i:6:p:893-915
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1052045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2015.1052045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2015.1052045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James D. J. Brown, 2009. "Identity and Foreign Policy: Baltic–Russian Relations and European Integration – Edited by E. Berg and P. Ehin," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 935-936, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael North & Barnard Turner, 2010. "The Baltic Sea and South China Sea regions: incomparable models of regional integration?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 271-277, November.
    2. Andrej Krickovic & Dmitry Novikov, 2015. "If You Can’T Beat Them to You Have to Join Them? Strategies Rising Powers Use to Challenge and Transform the International Order," HSE Working papers WP BRP 20/IR/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Kirsti Jõesalu, 2010. "The meaning of “late socialism”: analyzing Estonians’ post-communist memory culture," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 293-303, November.
    4. Birgit SCHMÖLZ, 2019. "Misunderstanding, conflict and divisions between the Visegrad Group and the European Union – an analytical discourse beyond the public cliché of the migration crisis," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11(1), pages 22-34, April.
    5. Eva-Clarita Pettai, 2015. "Negotiating History for Reconciliation: A Comparative Evaluation of the Baltic Presidential Commissions," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1079-1101, August.
    6. Ainius Lašas, 2012. "When History Matters: Baltic and Polish Reactions to the Russo-Georgian War," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(6), pages 1061-1075.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:67:y:2015:i:6:p:893-915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.