IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v64y2012i3p401-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nationalism for Export? The Domestic and Foreign-Policy Implications of the New ‘Russian Idea’

Author

Listed:
  • Luke March

Abstract

Focusing on diverse state approaches to nationalism provides a more nuanced view than that of Russian domestic and foreign policies driven directly by revanchist nationalism. The Russian authorities' ‘official nationality’ is moderate in aspiration. However, the effect is less benign because the Kremlin both mobilises extreme nationalism for regime goals and suppresses it when it becomes destabilising. This approach prevents nationalism either of extreme or moderate orientation becoming an influential, independent force in Russian politics. Such conflicting imperatives make Russia a more unpredictable international partner than if its policies were founded on a consistent ideological nationalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke March, 2012. "Nationalism for Export? The Domestic and Foreign-Policy Implications of the New ‘Russian Idea’," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(3), pages 401-425.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:64:y:2012:i:3:p:401-425
    DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2012.661927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668136.2012.661927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668136.2012.661927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tina Burrett, 2025. "Making Russia Great Again? Vladimir Putin’s Changing Sources of Legitimacy 2000–2024," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:64:y:2012:i:3:p:401-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.