IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v59y2007i4p541-566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The historical foundations of party politics in post-communist East Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • James Toole

Abstract

This article gauges how plausible deep historical explanations are in accounting for the emergence of particular types of parties in post-communist Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Generating and testing hypotheses from the centuries-long historical logic of Lipset and Rokkan's model of cleavage and party development, it finds that the historical foundations of post-communist parties may be deeper than most analyses assume and that the influence of the communist era may be less than is often believed. While a full understanding of the emergence of post-communist party types requires both historical and non-historical explanations, historical ones should not be underestimated.

Suggested Citation

  • James Toole, 2007. "The historical foundations of party politics in post-communist East Central Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(4), pages 541-566.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:59:y:2007:i:4:p:541-566
    DOI: 10.1080/09668130701289828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668130701289828
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668130701289828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2013. "Lessons From Eastern Europe Political Transitions For Reunification Of The Korean Peninsula," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(2), pages 49-62.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:59:y:2007:i:4:p:541-566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.