IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v35y2025i2p224-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Muslim pracademics as double brokers: a faith-sensitive, intersectional framework for understanding pracademics’ experiences and positionalities

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Philippa Eggert
  • Behar Sadriu

Abstract

The term pracademic, which describes individuals with dual identities as both academics and practitioners, is becoming increasingly common in global development circles. However, much of the academic literature on pracademics focuses on experiences of a relatively privileged elite of pracademics who are white, from the Global North, and working with secular organisations. Using collaborative autoethnography and mutual reflection, this study explores the multifaceted experiences and functions of Muslim pracademics, bringing religion to the fore and adding it to existing debates on race, gender, and development. The article illustrates how Muslim pracademics do not just act as brokers between academia, practice, and communities but also between faith-based and secular spheres. It proposes the use of faith-sensitive, intersectional frameworks to the study of pracademics’ experiences and positionalities. Challenging notions of development as a process that only occurs in formerly colonised countries, we compare experiences of pracademics in the UK and worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Philippa Eggert & Behar Sadriu, 2025. "Muslim pracademics as double brokers: a faith-sensitive, intersectional framework for understanding pracademics’ experiences and positionalities," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 224-237, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:224-237
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2024.2394770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2024.2394770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2024.2394770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:35:y:2025:i:2:p:224-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.