IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v34y2024i1p97-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing rural Ghanaian women’s economic empowerment: the cassava dough enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Asare-Nuamah
  • Daniella Delali Sedegah
  • Mavis Anane-Aboagye
  • Emelia Amoako Asiedu
  • Rosemary Anderson Akolaa

Abstract

Grounded in a qualitative case study design and relying on key informant interviews and focus group discussion, this study assesses the influence of the cassava dough enterprise on women’s economic empowerment in a rural Ghanaian community. Women in the study community are marginalised in accessing arable land, which is a critical livelihood asset. Cassava dough processing, which is a women-dominated activity, has become an alternative and lucrative business for women. Women's engagement in cassava dough processing is driven by myriad factors that are rooted in their sociocultural settings and gender norms. Women engaged in cassava dough processing and sales have enhanced their economic empowerment through increased access to regular income, improved financial autonomy and saving behaviour, and contributed to community development. The study recommends the need to prioritise policies, programs, and interventions that create an enabling environment for community-based women’s economic empowerment strategies in poor and vulnerable communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Asare-Nuamah & Daniella Delali Sedegah & Mavis Anane-Aboagye & Emelia Amoako Asiedu & Rosemary Anderson Akolaa, 2024. "Enhancing rural Ghanaian women’s economic empowerment: the cassava dough enterprise," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 97-114, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:34:y:2024:i:1:p:97-114
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2023.2272058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2023.2272058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2023.2272058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:34:y:2024:i:1:p:97-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.