IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v30y2020i4p448-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding participatory budgeting through formal and informal processes of inclusion: a case study in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Gladys Ann R. Maravilla
  • Jesse Hession Grayman

Abstract

From 2012 to 2017, the Philippines’ bottom-up budgeting (BUB) programme was a government initiative that leveraged participation to ensure the public were involved in crafting their own development programmes. This article advances notions of formal and informal spheres of participation to understand how the BUB empowered people by taking part in various participatory processes. The case study shows how participation is inherently political, but it cannot be disregarded as a potent tool for exercising democracy. The article highlights the potential of participatory practices in popular and informal spaces without abandoning the formal spheres of participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gladys Ann R. Maravilla & Jesse Hession Grayman, 2020. "Understanding participatory budgeting through formal and informal processes of inclusion: a case study in the Philippines," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 448-458, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:448-458
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2020.1721435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2020.1721435
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2020.1721435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:30:y:2020:i:4:p:448-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.