IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v30y2020i2p194-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the community development practitioners’ professional development programme: CIPP model application

Author

Listed:
  • Mokgadi Molope
  • Akpovire Oduaran

Abstract

Although resources are invested in maintaining the professional standards, knowledge, and skills of community development practitioners (CDPs), research has not established if they have benefited adequately from the provisions of an appropriate professional development programme. The Stufflebeam’s CIPP model was used to evaluate this, which is the first exercise of its kind in South Africa. This qualitative study reports on the circumstances associated with its planning. Lack of alignment between the professionals’ needs and learning activities was uncovered, which resulted from the absence of learning activities which meet the needs of CDPs and poor planning. A planning framework is proposed to mitigate the obstacles and challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Mokgadi Molope & Akpovire Oduaran, 2020. "Evaluation of the community development practitioners’ professional development programme: CIPP model application," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 194-206, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:30:y:2020:i:2:p:194-206
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1650894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2019.1650894
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2019.1650894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:30:y:2020:i:2:p:194-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.