IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v23y2013i5-6p742-754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dutch civil society at crossroads

Author

Listed:
  • Rik Habraken
  • Lucas Meijs
  • Lau Schulpen
  • Cristien Temmink

Abstract

The Netherlands have a rather large civil society. Interestingly, Dutch politicians and civil society organisations do not recognise this themselves, voicing frequent appeals for more civil society. This can be explained by the typical development of Dutch civil society through a system of pillarisation, based upon concepts of subsidiarity and sovereignty in one's own constituency, leading to a civil society that at the end has outsourced to the government important functions like financing, governing, and legitimising. Two cases (traditional and contemporary) are presented to show the consequences. Finally, lessons for other countries at civil society crossroads are drawn.La société civile néerlandaise à la croisée des cheminsLes Pays-Bas ont une société civile assez importante. Il est intéressant de constater que les personnalités politiques et les organisations de la société civile néerlandaises ne reconnaissent pas ce fait elles-mêmes ; en effet, elles lancent des appels fréquents à un élargissement de la société civile. Cela peut s'expliquer par le développement de la société civile néerlandaise à travers un système de polarisation, basé sur des concepts de subsidiarité et de souveraineté dans son propre groupe constituant, ce qui engendre une société civile qui, au final, a sous-traité au gouvernement des fonctions importantes comme le financement, le gouvernement et la légitimation. Deux cas (traditionnel et contemporain) sont présentés pour illustrer les conséquences. Enfin, des enseignements à l'intention d'autres pays dont la société civile se trouve à un carrefour sont proposés.La sociedad civil holandesa en la encrucijadaHolanda tiene una sociedad civil bastante grande. A pesar de ello, es interesante ver que los políticos y las organizaciones de la sociedad civil de Holanda no se dan por enterados, ya que a menudo hacen llamados a que la sociedad civil tenga mayor presencia. Lo anterior puede tener su explicación en el desarrollo de la sociedad civil holandesa, el cual se produjo típicamente, a través de un sistema de polarización basado en los conceptos de subsidiariedad y de soberanía a nivel de base, que finalmente dio lugar a una sociedad civil que subcontrató al gobierno para implementar ciertas actividades importantes, por ejemplo, el financiamiento, el acto de gobernar y la legitimización. Para mostrar las consecuencias de ello, se presentan dos casos, uno tradicional y otro contemporáneo. Por último, se examinan aquellos aprendizajes que pueden ser relevantes para las sociedades civiles de otros países que se encuentren en la encrucijada.Sociedade civil holandesa na encruzilhadaOs Países Baixos têm uma ampla sociedade civil. Interessantemente, os próprios políticos e organizações da sociedade civil de lá não reconhecem isto, fazendo frequentes apelos para haver mais participação da sociedade civil. Isto pode ser explicado pelo típico desenvolvimento da sociedade civil holandesa através de um sistema de polarização, baseado em conceitos de subsidiaridade e soberania em seu próprio eleitorado, levando a uma sociedade civil que, no final, tem delegado ao governo funções importantes como financiar, governar e legitimar. Dois casos (tradicional e contemporâneo) são apresentados para mostrar as consequências. Por fim, são extraídas lições para outros países cuja sociedade civil se encontre em uma encruzilhada.

Suggested Citation

  • Rik Habraken & Lucas Meijs & Lau Schulpen & Cristien Temmink, 2013. "Dutch civil society at crossroads," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5-6), pages 742-754, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:23:y:2013:i:5-6:p:742-754
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2013.801398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2013.801398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2013.801398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:23:y:2013:i:5-6:p:742-754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.