Author
Abstract
This paper discusses the discourse of “development” and its effects. It argues that there are good reasons for giving up the concept of development and replacing it with various other concepts. Practices that aim at improving the human condition need not be identified with the term “development”. Numerous practices which have not improved the human condition have been carried out in the name of “development”. These should not be seen as an abuse of a positive concept, but as linked to certain Eurocentric, depoliticising, and authoritarian implications of the concept of “development”. Le discours de « développement » et pourquoi le concept devrait être abandonné Cet article traite du discours sur le « développement » et de ses effets. L'auteur soutient qu'il y a de bonnes raisons d'abandonner le concept du développement pour le remplacer par plusieurs autres concepts. Les pratiques qui visent à améliorer la condition humaine n'ont pas besoin d’être identifiées par le terme « développement ». De nombreuses pratiques qui n'ont en rien amélioré la condition humaine ont été mises en œuvre au nom du développement. Elles ne devraient pas être perçues comme un abus d'un concept positif, mais comme étant liées à certaines implications eurocentriques, dépolitisantes et autoritaires du concept de « développement ». El discurso del “desarrollo” y por qué el concepto debe ser abandonado Este artículo analiza el discurso sobre el “desarrollo” y sus efectos. En este sentido, sostiene que existen buenas razones para abandonar el concepto de desarrollo y reemplazarlo por otros conceptos. Parte de la noción de que las acciones dirigidas a mejorar la condición humana no necesitan un asidero en el concepto de desarrollo, en tanto toma en cuenta que numerosas acciones realizadas en nombre del “desarrollo” no mejoraron la condición humana. Tales acciones no deben considerarse como abusos de un concepto positivo, sino el resultado de que el concepto de “desarrollo” haya sido viciado por sesgos eurocéntricos, depolitizantes y autoritarios. O discurso do “desenvolvimento” e por que o conceito deve ser abandonada Este artigo discute o discurso de “desenvolvimento” e seus efeitos. Ele argumenta que há boas razões para se abandonar o conceito de desenvolvimento e substituí-lo por vários outros conceitos. As práticas que visam melhorar a condição humana não necessitam ser identificadas com o termo “desenvolvimento”. Várias práticas que não têm melhorado a condição humana têm sido implementadas em nome do desenvolvimento. Estas práticas não devem ser vistas como um abuso de um conceito positivo, mas sim como sendo ligadas a certas implicações Eurocêntricas, despolitizantes e autoritárias do conceito de “desenvolvimento”.
Suggested Citation
Aram Ziai, 2013.
"The discourse of “development” and why the concept should be abandoned,"
Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 123-136.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:123-136
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2013.752792
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Mascarello, Júlia & Lehmann, Rosa & Giurca, Alexandru, 2024.
"Bioeconomy science collaboration between Brazil and Germany – On equal footing?,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
- Hassan Shahraki & Alireza Keikha, 2022.
"How the entrepreneurship can set aside the rural development process: a historical and discursive reflection on rural entrepreneurship and development policies in Iran,"
Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 219-235, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:123-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.