IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v22y2012i5-6p704-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are faith-based organisations distinctive? Comparing religious and secular NGOs in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Leurs

Abstract

This article presents the findings of a study of selected religious and secular non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working on HIV/AIDS in Nigeria. The study sought to identify whether, and in what circumstances, so-called faith-based organisations (FBOs) have distinctive characteristics with respect to their goals, values, organisational characteristics, and activities, compared to secular NGOs. It found that the FBOs studied are perceived by their staff, beneficiaries, and local observers as possessing some distinctive features and comparative advantages relative to secular NGOs. It argues, however, that a standardised donor preference for FBOs is inappropriate and may be counter-productive, since NGOs cannot be simply categorised as ‘religious’ or ‘secular’, there is still insufficient evidence to assess the outcomes and impact of their HIV/AIDS-related activities, and their effectiveness is influenced not only by their characteristics and strategies but also by the context in which they operate.Les organisations à base religieuse ont-elles des caractéristiques distinctes ? Comparaison entre les ONG religieuses et laïques au NigériaCet article présente les résultats d'une étude menée parmi des organisations non gouvernementales religieuses et laïques sélectionnées (ONG) qui travaillent dans le secteur du VIH/sida au Nigéria. Le but de cette étude était d'identifier si, et dans quelles circonstances, les organisations à base religieuse (OBR) présentent des traits bien distincts en ce qui concerne leurs buts, leurs valeurs, leurs caractéristiques organisationnelles et leurs activités, par rapport aux ONG laïques. On a constaté que les OBR étudiées sont perçues par leur personnel, leurs bénéficiaires et les observateurs locaux comme étant dotées de caractéristiques distinctes et d'avantages comparatifs par rapport aux ONG laïques. L'article soutient, néanmoins, qu'une préférence normalisée de la part des bailleurs de fonds en faveur des OBR n'est pas appropriée et pourrait aller à l'encontre du but recherché, puisque les ONG ne peuvent pas être simplement catégorisées comme « religieuses » ou « laïques », qu'il n'y a pour l'instant pas de données suffisantes pour évaluer les résultats et les impacts de leurs activités de lutte contre le VIH/sida, et que leur efficacité est influencée non seulement par leurs caractéristiques et stratégies, mais aussi par le contexte dans lequel elles travaillent.As Organizações Baseadas na Fé são diferentes? Comparando ONGs religiosas e seculares na NigériaEste artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo de Organizações Não-Governamentais (religiosas e seculares) trabalhando com a questão do HIV/AIDS na Nigéria. O estudo buscou identificar se, e em quais circunstâncias, as chamadas Organizações Baseadas na Fé (OBFs) possuem características diferenciadas em relação aos seus objetivos, valores, características organizacionais e atividades em comparação com ONGs seculares. Ele constatou que as OBFs estudadas são vistas pelos seus funcionários, beneficiários e observadores locais como possuidoras de algumas características diferenciadas e vantagens comparativas relativas a ONGs seculares. Ele argumenta, porém, que uma preferência padronizada dos doadores por OBFs é inapropriada e pode ser contra-produtiva, uma vez que as ONGs não podem simplesmente ser classificadas como “religiosas” ou “seculares; não há ainda evidências suficientes para avaliar os resultados e o impacto de suas atividades relativas ao HIV/AIDS e sua efetividade é influenciada não apenas por suas características e estratégias mas também pelo contexto no qual elas operam.¿Tienen características propias las organizaciones basadas en la fe? Comparando ONG religiosas y laicas en NigeriaEste ensayo presenta las conclusiones de un estudio sobre varias organizaciones no gubernamentales (ONG) religiosas y laicas que trabajan sobre VIH/SIDA en Nigeria. El estudio intentó determinar si las organizaciones basadas en la fe (OBF) tienen características que las diferencian de las ONG laicas y en qué contextos tomando en cuenta sus objetivos, valores, características organizacionales y actividades. El ensayo señala que, en opinión de su personal, de los beneficiarios y de informantes locales, las OBF tienen cualidades distintivas y ventajas comparativas respecto a las ONG laicas. Sostiene, sin embargo, que una preferencia exclusiva de los donantes por las OBF puede ser inadecuada y hasta contraproducente ya que las ONG no pueden ser clasificadas solo como religiosas o laicas. Hasta el momento no existe información suficiente para evaluar los resultados y el impacto del trabajo de las organizaciones en VIH/SIDA; su eficacia tiene que ver no solo con sus características y estrategias, sino también con el contexto de su trabajo.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Leurs, 2012. "Are faith-based organisations distinctive? Comparing religious and secular NGOs in Nigeria," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5-6), pages 704-720, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:5-6:p:704-720
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2012.685868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2012.685868
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2012.685868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:5-6:p:704-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.