Author
Abstract
This paper takes stock of current thinking about the nature and distinctiveness of faith-based organisations (FBOs) in development. Since the 1990s, public policy-linked scholarship from the USA has sought to define and categorise FBOs. More recently, many donors have increasingly chosen to work with and fund such organisations, giving rise to discussions about how FBOs working in development should be defined and classified, and how their contribution to development should be assessed. While many of the available studies portray FBOs as having comparative advantages over so-called secular organisations, this paper concludes that such a generalisation over-simplifies reality, particularly in the absence of convincing evidence. Further assessments of the characteristics, roles, and activities of all types of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are needed to assist in the choice of development partners and to test claims of distinctiveness and comparative advantage.Réflexion sur les organisations à base religieuse dans le développement : où en sommes-nous et quelles sont les étapes suivantes ?Cet article fait le point sur la réflexion actuelle concernant la nature et le caractère distinct des organisations à base religieuse (OBR) dans le développement. Depuis les années 1990, la réflexion théorique en matière de politiques publiques venue des États-Unis a cherché à définir et à catégoriser les OBR. Plus récemment, de nombreux bailleurs de fonds ont de plus en plus souvent décidé de travailler avec ces organisations et de les financer, ce qui a donné lieu à des discussions sur la manière dont les OBR qui travaillent dans le secteur du développement devraient être définies et classifiées, et sur la manière dont leur contribution au développement devrait être évaluée. Bien que nombre des études disponibles décrivent les OBR comme étant dotées d'avantages comparatifs par rapport aux organisations soi-disant laïques, cet article conclut que cette généralisation simplifie excessivement la réalité, en particulier en l'absence de données convaincantes. Des évaluations supplémentaires des caractéristiques, des rôles et des activités de tous les types d'organisations non gouvernementales (ONG) sont requises pour faciliter le choix de partenaires de développement et pour mettre à l'épreuve les revendications ayant trait au caractère distinct et à l'avantage comparatif.Pensando sobre organizações baseadas na fé no desenvolvimento: até onde chegamos e o que vem a seguir?Este artigo organiza ideias atuais sobre a natureza e distinção de Organizações Baseadas na Fé (OBFs) no desenvolvimento. Desde a década de 1990, bolsa de estudo ligada a políticas públicas dos EUA tem buscado definir e classificar as OBFs. Mais recentemente, vários doadores têm cada vez mais escolhido trabalhar com tais organizações e financiá-las, estimulando o debate sobre como as OBFs trabalhando na área de desenvolvimento devem ser definidas e classificadas e como sua contribuição para o desenvolvimento deve ser avaliada. Embora muitos dos estudos disponíveis retratam as OBFs como tendo vantagens comparativas sobre as chamadas organizações seculares, este artigo conclui que tal generalização simplifica excessivamente a realidade, particularmente na ausência de evidências convincentes. Outras avaliações das características, funções e atividades de todos os tipos de Organizações Não-Governamentais (ONGs) são necessárias para ajudar na escolha de parceiros de desenvolvimento e testar reivindicações de distinção e vantagem comparativa.Analizando las organizaciones basadas en la fe en el desarrollo: ¿dónde estamos y qué sigue?Este ensayo examina las ideas actuales sobre el carácter y lo distintivo de las organizaciones basadas en la fe (OBF) en el desarrollo. Desde los años 90, el ámbito académico estadounidense vinculado a las políticas públicas ha intentado definir y caracterizar a las OBF. Recientemente, varios donantes han decidido colaborar con estas organizaciones y financiarlas, dando pie a debates sobre la definición y la clasificación de las OBF que trabajan en desarrollo y sobre cómo su aporte al desarrollo deberá evaluarse. Muchos estudios afirman que las OBF cuentan con ventajas comparativas que no tienen las organizaciones laicas, pero este ensayo sostiene que tal afirmación es demasiado simple frente a la realidad y no cuenta con evidencia concluyente. Se requieren evaluaciones adicionales sobre las características, los roles y las actividades de todo tipo de organizaciones no gubernamentales para poder seleccionar contrapartes para el desarrollo y validar afirmaciones sobre idiosincrasias y ventajas comparativas.
Suggested Citation
Emma Tomalin, 2012.
"Thinking about faith-based organisations in development: where have we got to and what next?,"
Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5-6), pages 689-703, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:5-6:p:689-703
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2012.686600
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:22:y:2012:i:5-6:p:689-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.