IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v18y2008i4-5p611-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory risk assessment: a new approach for safer food in vulnerable African communities

Author

Listed:
  • Delia Grace
  • Tom Randolph
  • Janice Olawoye
  • Morenike Dipelou
  • Erastus Kang'ethe

Abstract

Women play the major role in food supply in developing countries, but too often their ability to feed their families properly is compromised; the result is high levels of food-borne disease and consequent limited access to higher-value markets. We argue that risk-based approaches – current best practice for managing food safety in developed countries – require adaptation to the difficult context of informal markets. We suggest participatory research and gender analysis as boundary-spanning mechanisms, bringing communities and food-safety implementers together to analyse food-safety problems and develop workable solutions. Examples show how these methodologies can contribute to operationalising risk-based approaches in urban settings and to the development of a new approach to assessing and managing food safety in poor countries, which we call ‘participatory risk analysis’.

Suggested Citation

  • Delia Grace & Tom Randolph & Janice Olawoye & Morenike Dipelou & Erastus Kang'ethe, 2008. "Participatory risk assessment: a new approach for safer food in vulnerable African communities," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 611-618.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:18:y:2008:i:4-5:p:611-618
    DOI: 10.1080/09614520802181731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614520802181731
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614520802181731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:18:y:2008:i:4-5:p:611-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.