IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ccasxx/v43y2024i4p468-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The emotional sight of neoliberalized port infrastructure in the city of Poti, Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Komakhidze

Abstract

This article traces an ethnography-based analysis of the historical Poti port as it has been socially imagined through the lenses of ideological transformations. Situated at a nexus of Black Sea trading infrastructure, the city of Poti has been known as the gateway of Georgia, between Asia and Europe. The port, in its current location since the late nineteenth century, has been an economic asset to colonial powers (Russian Tsarist, Soviet state-socialist) and neoliberal economic agendas. Its infrastructure, which encompasses a specific field of trading and transit functions, encapsulates a social layer while affecting the daily lives of inhabitants. People’s reflections on either development or decay can evoke emotional perceptions of and reflections on this urban infrastructure. Living and producing infrastructure, gazing at constructed landscapes and associating oneself with particular spatial reflections all have an immersive effect on the city’s morale, evoking feelings of pride, shame and uncertainty. Thus, I aim to present in what sense the port is attached in people’s reflections to these emotional domains. I contend that specific neoliberal ideological experiences set the area of Poti port morally and socially apart from the inhabitants’ everyday reflections.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Komakhidze, 2024. "The emotional sight of neoliberalized port infrastructure in the city of Poti, Georgia," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 468-486, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:468-486
    DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2024.2341914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02634937.2024.2341914
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02634937.2024.2341914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:468-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ccas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.