IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v65y2022i3p541-571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Infant company protection in the German semi-synthetic fibre industry: Market power, technology, the Nazi government and the post-1945 world market

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Scherner
  • Mark Spoerer

Abstract

In the 1920 and early 1930s, the German semi-synthetic fibre industry was dominated by a duopoly of two big players. The incumbent firms were not willing to expand their staple fibre capacities to the extent demanded by the new Nazi government, which prepared for autarky and war. Hence the government encouraged other private companies, especially spinning mills, to found eight regional staple fibre plants and protected them against the incumbents who were technologically superior. The Nazis’ infant company protection policy enabled the ­newcomers to become competitive both in economic and technological terms within a few years. After the war and without protection, these firms flourished on the world market. While the big players left the market, two of the newcomers founded in the second half of the 1930s are today the last European producers of staple fibre. We analyse in detail why companies founded for protectionist reasons by a non-benign government became successful firms competing on the world market.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Scherner & Mark Spoerer, 2022. "Infant company protection in the German semi-synthetic fibre industry: Market power, technology, the Nazi government and the post-1945 world market," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 541-571, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:65:y:2022:i:3:p:541-571
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2021.1900118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2021.1900118
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2021.1900118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:65:y:2022:i:3:p:541-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.