IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v62y2020i5p837-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Lilliputians attacking IBM: Balancing innovation and competition in the European Commission’s first big antitrust case (1973–1984)

Author

Listed:
  • Arthe Van Laer

Abstract

The European Commission’s case against IBM for abuse of dominant position (1973–1984) was at the time by far the biggest in the short history of EEC antitrust policy, and would remain so long afterwards. It also set an important precedent for the use of interoperability as competition law remedy. Through extensive archival research, this article shows that the EEC Commission’s action in the IBM case was determined by broader industrial policy aims for the computer sector. The Commission opted for augmenting competition, at the potential detriment of innovation, because this was expected to enhance the competitiveness of European industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthe Van Laer, 2020. "The European Lilliputians attacking IBM: Balancing innovation and competition in the European Commission’s first big antitrust case (1973–1984)," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(5), pages 837-857, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:5:p:837-857
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1444754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2018.1444754
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2018.1444754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:5:p:837-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.