IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v62y2020i5p717-742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business history and European integration: How EEC competition policy affected companies’ strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Rollings
  • Laurent Warlouzet

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue on business responses to European competition policy considers the development of research in the field of European competition policy. It is argued that existing analyses have concentrated on the development of policy over time and that we know surprisingly little about the response of business to the demands of competition policy. This is important because it is apparent that ever stricter legal provision has not removed the problem and where there appears to be a considerable degree of recidivism. The aim of the special issue is to begin to address these issues by examining the response of different companies and sectors to the existence of EEC/EU competition policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Rollings & Laurent Warlouzet, 2020. "Business history and European integration: How EEC competition policy affected companies’ strategies," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(5), pages 717-742, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:5:p:717-742
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2018.1488966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2018.1488966
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2018.1488966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Felisini, 2021. "Going beyond borders? An ongoing research project on business in European integration," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(2), pages 133-140.
    2. Kornelakis, Andreas & Petrakaki, Dimitra, 2024. "Technological innovation, industry platforms or financialization? A comparative institutional perspective on Nokia, Apple, and Samsung," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124386, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:5:p:717-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.