IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v62y2020i3p438-450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between values orientation and economic logic: Bosch in the Third Reich

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes Bähr

Abstract

Bosch’s position among the German major corporations was special during the Third Reich. The company was not only the biggest German automotive supplier, but also a family enterprise with a conspicuous corporate culture that rested on the principles of its founder Robert Bosch. Robert Bosch’s principles were irreconcilable with the Nazi ideology. Bosch’s top management, therefore, found itself in an increasingly difficult balancing act between business interests and adherence to its values. In this article we ask what room for manoeuvre Bosch had under these conditions and how its top management acted. Apparently, the firm was able to retain considerable room for manoeuvre in internal matters, especially its personnel policy, and used it in the interest of its Jewish employees. At the same time, Bosch’s armament production expanded vigorously. Bosch was a key manufacturer in the German war economy. During the last war years, the enterprise betrayed its principles in the treatment of its slave labourers, when at the same time members of the top management actively supported the resistance against Hitler. The example of Bosch demonstrates that the business of the enterprise during the Third Reich followed the structure of the market, and not the principles of its management.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes Bähr, 2020. "Between values orientation and economic logic: Bosch in the Third Reich," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 438-450, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:3:p:438-450
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2019.1691343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2019.1691343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2019.1691343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:62:y:2020:i:3:p:438-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.