IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v44y2002i4p85-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Information Quality Theories: The USS Joint Venture with William Holyman & Sons and Huddart Parker Ltd, 1904-35

Author

Listed:
  • G. Boyce
  • L. Lepper

Abstract

Scholars concerned with an information-based view of an economy make an implicit assumption that firm efficiencies are based on information of good quality. In this firm-specific study an explanation of the importance of information quality is given by utilising and extending Casson's diagrammatic methodology for representing information flows. This has been done by measuring aspects of the information flows through Wm. Holyman & Sons Ltd and Holymans Ltd, for five years during the period 1904 to 1935. The shipping firms of Union Steamship Company of New Zealand (USSCo.), Wm. Holyman & Sons Ltd (Holyman's), and Huddart Parker Company Ltd (HP) were joint-venture partners. A content analysis methodology was applied to the Head Office records of USSCo. The results have provided a way of extending Casson's diagrammatic methodology and in so doing, added to Casson's own contribution to the theory of the firm. The evidence from the archives suggests that a high quality of information underpinned the joint venture and ensured success for a 75-year period. Furthermore, the research findings support the thesis that information of high quality contributes in a significant way to firm efficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Boyce & L. Lepper, 2002. "Assessing Information Quality Theories: The USS Joint Venture with William Holyman & Sons and Huddart Parker Ltd, 1904-35," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 85-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:44:y:2002:i:4:p:85-120
    DOI: 10.1080/713999291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713999291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/713999291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:44:y:2002:i:4:p:85-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.