IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v39y1997i2p69-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allies or Subsidiaries? Inter-Company Relations in the P&O Group, 1914-39

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Napier

Abstract

Alfred Chandler has recently suggested that 'the general failure to develop organisational capabilities weakened British industry and with it the British economy'. However, his view has been criticised as regards British multinational investment, where organisational forms such as mercantile groups were significant. This article examines the organisational links between companies in the P&O shipping group during a period in which it was mainly located within the Inchcape mercantile group. Links were loose and often informal, which facilitated devolution of decision making. Although the financial crisis faced by the P&O group in 1932 may partly have been due to an excessive accumulation of information and control in the hands of a single individual, the organisational structure proved sufficiently resilient to persist after the crisis had been resolved. It is concluded that, in the inter-war years just as in the pre-World War I period, personal capitalism and informal organisational structures benefited from networks of trust and thus cannot be rejected as weak.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Napier, 1997. "Allies or Subsidiaries? Inter-Company Relations in the P&O Group, 1914-39," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 69-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:39:y:1997:i:2:p:69-93
    DOI: 10.1080/00076799700000051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00076799700000051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076799700000051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:39:y:1997:i:2:p:69-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.