IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i9p996-1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Tan
  • Yufei Chen
  • Wei Tian
  • Kailun Li

Abstract

As China’s economy enters the ‘new normal’ operational stage, the widespread adoption of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model has engendered substantial transformations in infrastructure investment and financing practices, progressively moving towards standardization. This study employs indicators such as Research and Development (R&D) investments and the number of patents held by publicly listed companies to assess their innovation performance. Employing a Differences-in-Differences (DID) empirical methodology, and utilizing the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) trend-matching technique to establish experimental and control groups, we empirically investigate whether participation in PPP projects exerts an influence on the innovation investments of listed companies and whether it results in a detrimental crowding-out effect. The empirical findings of our analysis demonstrate that engagement in PPP projects leads to a reduction in the innovation investments made by listed companies, thereby exerting a significant impact. Additionally, the magnitude of the crowding-out effect on innovation is positively correlated with the number of PPP projects, though the effect is not particularly pronounced or statistically significant. This study further conducts an in-depth comparative analysis of the innovation levels observed within state-owned enterprises and private firms. It subsequently proposes targeted solutions aimed at enhancing the innovation capacities of both state-owned and private enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Tan & Yufei Chen & Wei Tian & Kailun Li, 2025. "Public-private partnership effect on the company technology innovation-empirical and theory: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 996-1009, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:9:p:996-1009
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2311059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2311059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2311059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:9:p:996-1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.