IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i15p1803-1817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The probability of Chapter 11 firms refiling again: a censored hazard approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Pierre Fenech
  • Barry Williams
  • Ying Kai Yap

Abstract

Firms seeking bankruptcy protection for the second time may seem inefficient, particularly for courts and other key stakeholders involved in the debtor firm’s reorganization process. In our study, we analyse the survival and hazard patterns of firms that applied for a second bankruptcy protection, after emerging successfully from their first. Debtor firms surviving 33 months after emerging from their first bankruptcy protection are less likely to refile again. We note evidence of firms’ debt levels being the main financial characteristic connected with refiling. When we control for the introduction of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, we report no significant impact on firm recidivism. We identify a structural break with respect to factors determining the probability of refiling: around 2018 firm size and pre-agreed bankruptcy negotiations stopped being a significant characteristic to firms refiling for the second time. Overall, we note that the financial/non-financial characteristics affecting the first filing does not necessarily apply to their second filing. Such findings have implications for policy-makers and key stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Pierre Fenech & Barry Williams & Ying Kai Yap, 2025. "The probability of Chapter 11 firms refiling again: a censored hazard approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15), pages 1803-1817, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:15:p:1803-1817
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2316667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2316667
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2316667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:15:p:1803-1817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.