IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i13p1493-1509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity and competing interests: what factors bear on payment choices and financial decisions made for older people entering nursing homes?

Author

Listed:
  • Anam Bilgrami
  • Henry Cutler
  • Yuanyuan Gu
  • Mona Aghdaee
  • Megan Gu

Abstract

Each year, many frail older people in Australia and their informal carers, are faced with the complex choice of how to pay for nursing home accommodation (through a refundable, one-off lump sum payment on entry, daily ‘rent-style’ interest payments or a combination), a choice interconnected with several other financial decisions. The payment choice often needs to be made suddenly after a health shock and within tight timeframes, and impacts an older person’s income, consumption, and long-term wealth. To explore what factors potentially bear on this complex choice, we modelled payment choices in online survey data using multinomial and fractional logistic regression. We found payment choices to be associated with an older person’s finances, family situation and health situation, supporting that individual budgets and access to liquidity constrains choice. Informal carer characteristics including educational attainment, English-speaking background, investment risk appetite and perceived stress were associated with choices, suggesting informal carers may directly or indirectly exert influence. Nursing home providers’ payment preferences were also associated with choices, suggesting potential influence due to providers’ capital financing requirements. We offer policy suggestions on reducing the complexity of payment choices, and better aligning the interests of consumers and providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anam Bilgrami & Henry Cutler & Yuanyuan Gu & Mona Aghdaee & Megan Gu, 2025. "Complexity and competing interests: what factors bear on payment choices and financial decisions made for older people entering nursing homes?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(13), pages 1493-1509, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:13:p:1493-1509
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2313593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2313593
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2313593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:13:p:1493-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.