IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i59p8704-8718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the impact of the embedding effect in contingent valuation studies of cultural public goods: the case of museums

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Baldin
  • Trine Bille

Abstract

The embedding effect represents one of the most challenging problems of the contingent valuation (CV) method. The purpose of this study is to address the issue of embedding effect in the context of museums, by estimating the size and extent of the problem. A CV study conducted in Denmark asked respondents to evaluate both the Danish museum-system (inclusive good) and the specific local museum in their municipality of residence (embedded good). Typically, an equal or very close willingness-to-pay (WTP) for the two goods would indicate the presence of an embedding effect. However, we show that this will only be the case for some respondents, while for others the similarity between the two WTP reflects an exclusive interest for the local museum. We demonstrate the existence of these two different types of respondents by using a latent class model where respondents are clustered based on answers to the CV survey. Consequently, the aggregate WTP and the bias associated with the embedding effect are estimated. Our results have implications in terms of the reliability of CV studies and its implementation in actual policy issues, demonstrating that the right questions and techniques will facilitate the separation of ‘true’ answers from biased ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Baldin & Trine Bille, 2024. "Measuring the impact of the embedding effect in contingent valuation studies of cultural public goods: the case of museums," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(59), pages 8704-8718, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:59:p:8704-8718
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2293668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2293668
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2293668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:59:p:8704-8718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.