IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i56p7582-7599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pollution charges and firms’ energy efficiency: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu
  • Hongzhong Fan
  • Xinyan Wei

Abstract

Pollution charges are an important way to improve energy efficiency. Using the relevant data of Chinese industrial firms from 2003 to 2010, we take China’s Pollution Levy Standard Reform (PLSR) implemented in 2007 as a quasi-natural experiment, and use the staggered difference-in-differences method to empirically test the impact of pollution charges on green total factor energy efficiency (GTFEE) of firms. We find that pollution charges significantly increase firms’ GTFEE. This result is still valid under a series of robustness tests. The potential mechanism is that although pollution charges increase the cost of firms, they also promote technological innovation of firms, and ultimately in the overall effect pollution charges improve the GTFEE of firms. In addition, the positive effect of pollution charges on GTFEE is greater for non-state owned enterprises, non-exporting enterprises and enterprises in heavily polluting industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Hongzhong Fan & Xinyan Wei, 2024. "Pollution charges and firms’ energy efficiency: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(56), pages 7582-7599, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:56:p:7582-7599
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2288042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2288042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2288042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:56:p:7582-7599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.