IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i56p7530-7548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Willingness-to-pay for standardizing medication information: a two-pronged stated preference approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bern Caudill Dealy
  • Carolyn Wolff
  • Aaron Kearsley
  • Elizabeth Botkins

Abstract

When patients lack information about their medications, they are more likely to experience adverse events that may have costly health outcomes. One possible approach for improving the information that patients receive about their medications is to standardize the written information that pharmacies provide so that it is uniform and easier to read. While patients have expressed a preference for this standardization, no previous study has provided nationally representative estimates of its monetary benefits. In this paper, we estimate willingness to pay (WTP) to measure the potential benefits of standardizing the medication information leaflets that pharmacies provide to patients. We use data collected from an online, nationally representative, stated preference survey administered to non-institutionalized adults age 18 and over in the United States. Survey respondents were randomized to receive either open-ended valuation questions or referendum-style valuation questions. Responses from the open-ended questions suggest a mean WTP between approximately $3 and $13 per year depending on the treatment of outliers. Regression results suggest that those who received the referendum-style questions would be willing to pay, on average, just under $7 per year for the standardization.

Suggested Citation

  • Bern Caudill Dealy & Carolyn Wolff & Aaron Kearsley & Elizabeth Botkins, 2024. "Measuring the Willingness-to-pay for standardizing medication information: a two-pronged stated preference approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(56), pages 7530-7548, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:56:p:7530-7548
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2288037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2288037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2288037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:56:p:7530-7548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.