IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i54p7083-7096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informal institutions and corporate social responsibility: a Confucian culture perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Hemei Li
  • Juncheng Li
  • Jibin Wang
  • Lu Yang

Abstract

Few papers have studied the impact of informal institutions on the fulfilment of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2018, this paper investigates the impact of informal institutions, proxied as the Confucian culture, on CSR. The results show that the Confucian culture is beneficial to promoting the fulfilment of CSR, and this positive impact is unchanged after robust tests. Confucian culture will affect CSR through corporate reputation and industry peer effects. Through a series of heterogeneity tests, we found the following results: (1) The promoting effect of Confucian culture mainly exists in non-state-owned enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises. (2) In areas with imperfect formal institutions and underdeveloped economies, the informal institutions represented by Confucian culture can play a complementary role to formal institutions, assisting in promoting CSR. (3) The impact of foreign culture will weaken the positive role of Confucian culture in fulfilling CSR. Based on the introduction of Confucian culture, our findings clarify and highlight the role of informal institutions on CSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemei Li & Juncheng Li & Jibin Wang & Lu Yang, 2024. "Informal institutions and corporate social responsibility: a Confucian culture perspective," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(54), pages 7083-7096, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:54:p:7083-7096
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2277696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2277696
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2277696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:54:p:7083-7096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.