IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i50p6126-6143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political connection and firm diversification: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Dai
  • Yukun Wang

Abstract

Connections give diversified firms an advantage. This study investigates whether firms will be less diversified when the connections to the government are abruptly interrupted, using a dataset on the firm’s subsidiaries and the political connectedness of all listed private firms in China. In 2013, an unanticipated reform intended to combat corruption forced all politically connected independent directors of listed firms to resign. We find that those affected firms become less diversified after the reform. The estimation results are not driven by changes in the number of subsidiaries, government development goals, CEO’s political incentives, or other commercial system reforms. Placebo events for SOEs and firms’ academic background yield no effects. The effects are larger for local connections and stronger institutions. We also find that depoliticized firms are less likely to enter regulated and profitable industries and acquire less government economic support. Our results suggest that diversified firms could be ‘parasites’ of the economic-political institutions in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Dai & Yukun Wang, 2024. "Political connection and firm diversification: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(50), pages 6126-6143, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:50:p:6126-6143
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2267822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2267822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2267822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:50:p:6126-6143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.