IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i50p6091-6108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers’ administrative positions and students’ non-cognitive abilities in China: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Boou Chen
  • Chunkai Zhao

Abstract

This research investigates the causal relationship between teachers’ administrative positions and students’ non-cognitive abilities (NCAs) in China using a quasi-natural experiment of random student-classroom assignment. The results suggest that headteachers’ administrative positions significantly improve students’ NCAs, especially the extraversion and neuroticism. This positive effect is more pronounced in headteachers with higher administrative positions, middle titles, and more teaching experience. Meanwhile, girls and urban students benefited more from headteachers’ administrative positions. Furthermore, the mechanism analysis indicates this positive effect can be explained by the improvement of teachers’ job satisfaction, higher frequency of using more advanced teaching equipment, more parental respect, increased sense of belonging to the class, and peer effects. Our findings further enrich the impact of teacher characteristics on students’ NCAs and highlight the potential benefits of teachers’ administrative positions on student human capital. Also, this paper had policy implications for promoting students’ human capital development by optimizing teacher assignment and allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Boou Chen & Chunkai Zhao, 2024. "Teachers’ administrative positions and students’ non-cognitive abilities in China: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(50), pages 6091-6108, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:50:p:6091-6108
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2267819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2267819
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2267819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:50:p:6091-6108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.