IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i49p5863-5886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the impact of decoupled subsidies on farm performance: a counterfactual analysis using microdata

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Mennig
  • Johannes Sauer

Abstract

The 2003 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, which decoupled farm subsidies from production, was expected to increase farmers’ market orientation and to positively impact farm productivity. This theoretical effect of decoupling on farm performance has been verified in a few ex-post analyses. However, these studies lack important aspects of farm-level policy impact evaluations. First, they do not use a well-defined counterfactual scenario, second they do not account for farm heterogeneity when measuring performance and third they do not assess farm performance in a comprehensive manner. We address these shortcomings by combining quasi-experimental empirical methods with a latent-class production function. Using UK and French farm-level data, we show that farms indeed operate with distinct production technologies and that decoupling had positive and significant effects on productivity. Our results further show that under decoupling, farmers tend to diversify their businesses while keeping environmental pressure at a similar level as with coupled support.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Mennig & Johannes Sauer, 2024. "Revisiting the impact of decoupled subsidies on farm performance: a counterfactual analysis using microdata," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(49), pages 5863-5886, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:49:p:5863-5886
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2266601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2266601
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2266601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:49:p:5863-5886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.