IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i30p3636-3651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge flows and innovation: a pseudo-panel approach

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Biscione
  • Chiara Burlina
  • Annunziata de Felice

Abstract

This study investigates whether the effect of vertical and horizontal knowledge sources affect technological innovation for a sample of firms in 10 European countries. The empirical analysis is based on a unique dataset extracted from the Community Innovation Survey for the period 2002 to 2012. Results, using a pseudo-panel approach at country-industry level, reveal that vertical knowledge from suppliers strongly affects both product and process innovation, while knowledge flows from clients influence in particular product innovation. Finally, horizontal knowledge flows from competitors appear to have an effect on process innovation. These findings are validated with an instrumental variable approach using Lewbel’s technique to internally generate reliable instruments, when external ones are not suitable. Overall, results seem to suggest the need for ad-hoc policies to foster knowledge flows among firms in different phases of the production process to boost their innovative capacity both for products and processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Biscione & Chiara Burlina & Annunziata de Felice, 2024. "Knowledge flows and innovation: a pseudo-panel approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(30), pages 3636-3651, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:30:p:3636-3651
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2207812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2207812
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2207812?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:30:p:3636-3651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.