IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i30p3600-3620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can environmental SDGs moderate trade and environment nexus? A South Asian context based on panel ARDL approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rupamanjari Sinha Ray

Abstract

The study renews the debate over trade openness and environmental quality by empirically examining the moderating role of environmental SDGs, viz., affordable and clean energy (SDG 7) and climate action (SDG 13), in South Asia. Static panel regression analysis is undertaken, followed by a panel ARDL approach and the Engle-Granger causality test. All eight South Asian countries and a study period of 2002–2019 constitute the panel data set for the present analysis. The result suggests that while SDG 7 is a game changer in doing away with the pollution haven, the moderating impacts of SDG 7 and SDG 13 further reinforce the EKC hypothesis in the region. Both SDG 7 and SDG 13 exhibit long-run moderating effects on the pollution haven, and SDG 13 is observed to have a short-run moderating causal impact. The novel introduction of environmental SDGs to resolve the classical trade and environment debate has policy implications for simultaneous advancements towards SDG 7 and SDG 13. The study is valuable from the perspective of international cooperation, particularly when South Asian economies are not beyond the gloom of global permacrisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Rupamanjari Sinha Ray, 2024. "Can environmental SDGs moderate trade and environment nexus? A South Asian context based on panel ARDL approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(30), pages 3600-3620, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:30:p:3600-3620
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2206636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2206636
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2206636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:30:p:3600-3620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.