IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i17p2058-2076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does dollarization promote trade? Evidence from two recent episodes

Author

Listed:
  • Julián P. Díaz

Abstract

We quantify the trade-promotion effects of sharing a common currency by examining two recent episodes of official dollarization. To establish causal relationships, while avoiding the methodological criticisms of the previous literature on the issue (endogeneity and heteroskedasticity), we employ a differences-in-differences strategy that compares the pre- and post-dollarization trade flows between the United States and the two dollarizers (Ecuador and El Salvador) with the trade flows between the United States and the dollarizers’ neighbours. We find that the adoption of the dollar did not bring about any significant positive trade effects. Using product-level data we find that, while a few sectors saw positive increases, those instances are scattered and not the norm. Dollarization did not lead to increases in trade of previously non-traded goods either. Finally, we do not find any trade-promotion effects between Ecuador or El Salvador and the other dollarized country in the region (Panama) or between the newly dollarized countries themselves. These findings remain valid after we perform a battery of robustness tests, including PPML estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Julián P. Díaz, 2024. "Does dollarization promote trade? Evidence from two recent episodes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 2058-2076, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:17:p:2058-2076
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2178632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2178632
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2178632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:17:p:2058-2076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.