IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i12p1341-1355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the scientific and technological innovation efficiency of universities in China: evidence from the global Malmquist–Luenberger index model

Author

Listed:
  • Tian-Tian Zhu
  • Ya-Hua Lu
  • Yue-Jun Zhang

Abstract

The evaluation of the scientific and technological (S&T) innovation efficiency of universities is important for the ‘double first-class’ construction in China. However, related research often only considers desirable outputs while ignoring undesirable ones, which tends to produce biased evaluation results. For this reason, this study takes the ratio of unemployed graduates as undesirable output, and uses the global Malmquist – Luenberger index method to evaluate the S&T innovation efficiency of 31 relevant universities in China during 2013–2017, then develops a panel Tobit model to analyse its influencing factors. The results reveal that: first, during the sample period, the S&T innovation efficiency of those universities improved overall, and technical progress was the main driver. Second, excluding undesirable output will result in an overestimate of the S&T innovation efficiency of universities. Third, the S&T innovation efficiency of universities features regional distribution, with high efficiency in the west and low efficiency in the east. Moreover, different regions have different drivers for the improvement of S&T innovation efficiency of universities, with technical progress for the east and technical efficiency changes for the central and west. Finally, the ‘double first-class’ construction proposal in China has significantly promoted the improvement of S&T innovation efficiency in universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian-Tian Zhu & Ya-Hua Lu & Yue-Jun Zhang, 2023. "Evaluating the scientific and technological innovation efficiency of universities in China: evidence from the global Malmquist–Luenberger index model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 1341-1355, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:12:p:1341-1355
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2097185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2097185
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2097185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Wei & Yuan, Hang & Shao, Xin, 2024. "Does China Have an “Innovation Paradox”? Evidence from Chinese Colleges and Universities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Biao Chen & Yan Chen & Yajing Sun & Yu Tong & Ling Liu, 2024. "The measurement, level, and influence of resource allocation efficiency in universities: empirical evidence from 13 “double first class” universities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:12:p:1341-1355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.