IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v54y2022i2p155-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a matching decomposition to examine the gender technology gap in Tanzanian agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Scholz
  • Awudu Abdulai

Abstract

The promotion of gender equality in access to productive resources relies on multiple valid arguments. However, whether equal resource endowment would result in equal agricultural productivity is controversial. Using panel data from Tanzania, we examine the agricultural technology levels of male and female managed plots, and find that female farmers operate on a significantly lower technology level than their male counterparts. Thus, even if female farmers used the same amount of agricultural inputs and were equally efficient as male farmers, they would probably still attain lower yields. We employ a matching and decomposition approach to analyse whether the difference in technology between male and female managed plots originates from observations outside the common support or different distributions of productive resources, household characteristics, or crop choice within the common support. We find that most plots under female and male management are well comparable and fall into the common support, but different distributions of considered characteristics cannot sufficiently explain the observed differences in levels of technology among female and male farmers. Only among the few farmers that apply inorganic fertilizer, female and male farmers work on a similar technology level.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Scholz & Awudu Abdulai, 2022. "Using a matching decomposition to examine the gender technology gap in Tanzanian agriculture," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 155-169, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:2:p:155-169
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1963661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2021.1963661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2021.1963661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:2:p:155-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.