IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v53y2021i18p2080-2092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does land renting-out increase farmers’ subjective well-being? Evidence from rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Tongwei Qiu
  • Qinying He
  • Biliang Luo

Abstract

Although the literature finds that renting out farmland can increase farmer’s income, whether lessors’ subjective well-being (SWB) increases or not has been under-analysed. We use data from the 2015 China Household Finance Survey to investigate the relationship between land rental transaction and farmers’ SWB. The results indicate that renting-out farmland does not increase farmers’ SWB if ignoring the types of transaction partners. Further analysis shows that lessors transacting with acquaintances have higher SWB than those transacting with non-acquaintances, and there is no difference in SWB between lessors transacting with non-acquaintances and farmers without land renting-out. This is because although lessors transacting with non-acquaintances obtain higher land rents, they lose the farmland that is the channel of investing in social capitals, which leads to less helps from kin, friends or neighbours when they encounter difficulties. Our analysis implies that lessors’ subjective welfare does not increase even if rural economy and rural residents are commonly regarded to be beneficial from land transfers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tongwei Qiu & Qinying He & Biliang Luo, 2021. "Does land renting-out increase farmers’ subjective well-being? Evidence from rural China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 2080-2092, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:18:p:2080-2092
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1855315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2020.1855315
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2020.1855315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Hepei & Ma, Wanglin & Li, Junpeng & Yang, Wei, 2023. "Can citrus farmers earn more from selling online?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1549-1560.
    2. Tongwei Qiu & Xinjie Shi & Biliang Luo, 2022. "Formalizing agricultural rentals in China: Does local public action help?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    3. Qiu, Tongwei & Zhang, Danru & Choy, S.T. Boris & Luo, Biliang, 2021. "The interaction between informal and formal institutions: A case study of private land property rights in rural China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 578-591.
    4. Fachao Liang & Zehua Wang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2022. "Can Land Policy Promote Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Study on Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in Jinjiang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    6. Tan, Jing & Cai, Dongliang & Han, Kefei & Zhou, Kui, 2022. "Understanding peasant household’s land transfer decision-making: A perspective of financial literacy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:18:p:2080-2092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.