IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v52y2020i54p5986-5994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The size-rank relationship for market shares of consumer packaged goods

Author

Listed:
  • Young Han Bae
  • Thomas S. Gruca
  • Hyunwoo Lim
  • Gary J. Russell

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between market share and its rank for a comprehensive set of product categories and subcategories in the U.S consumer packaged goods industry. Based on prior research, we expect that the slope of the market share-rank relationship will be more consistent with the Zipf distribution at the higher levels of aggregation (category-level versus subcategory-level shares). Two alternative model formulations were examined: the size-rank power law and an exponential alternative used in prior research. Model parameters were estimated across categories (and subcategories) using random coefficients for both the slopes and intercepts. The overall slopes for both samples were significantly higher than −1, the slope consistent with the Zipf distribution. However, as expected, we also found that the slope associated with data from the higher level of aggregation (category level) is flatter than that from the lower level of aggregation (subcategory level). We discuss implications of these results for future research on the size-rank relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Han Bae & Thomas S. Gruca & Hyunwoo Lim & Gary J. Russell, 2020. "The size-rank relationship for market shares of consumer packaged goods," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(54), pages 5986-5994, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:54:p:5986-5994
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1781774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2020.1781774
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2020.1781774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:54:p:5986-5994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.