IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v52y2020i22p2353-2365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the differences in the impact of climate change on innovation between developed and developing countries: evidence from a panel system GMM analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelaziz Hakimi
  • Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Abstract

This article aims to explore the dynamic relationship between innovation and climate changes for a sample of 60 countries. We performed an aggregated analysis in which we use the whole sample (60 countries) and a disaggregated analysis in which we split the sample in developed (36 countries) and developing (24 countries). We estimate a balance panel dynamic System Generalized Method of Moment approach for the period 2008–2014. Findings of the aggregated analysis indicate that for the whole sample, there is a positive response from climate change to innovation. Recent climate changes have a positive impact on the innovation process. The disaggregate analysis shows that for developed countries, there is a positive response from climate changes to innovation only for total CO2 emission and CO2 emission from natural gas. However, there is a negative response from the other CO2 emission towards innovation. For the developing countries, the overall results indicate that there is no significant effect from climate change to innovation. Furthermore, findings indicate also, that the level of growth and research and development expenditure exert a positive effect on innovation process for both aggregate and disaggregate analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelaziz Hakimi & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2020. "Examining the differences in the impact of climate change on innovation between developed and developing countries: evidence from a panel system GMM analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(22), pages 2353-2365, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:22:p:2353-2365
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1690126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2019.1690126
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2019.1690126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Jiekuan & Zhang, Yan, 2020. "Tourism and gender equality: An Asian perspective," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Murthi, Srinivash & Zhang, Wen & Shaturaev, Jakhongir, 2023. "Role of Tourism in Ensuring Gender Equity: An Asian Perspective," MPRA Paper 118486, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2023.
    3. Uyar, Ali & Bani-Mustafa, Ahmed & Nimer, Khalil & Schneider, Friedrich & Hasnaoui, Amir, 2021. "Does innovation capacity reduce tax evasion? Moderating effect of intellectual property rights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. M. Gouveia & R. Inglesi-Lotz, 2021. "Examining the relationship between climate change-related research output and CO2 emissions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 9069-9111, November.
    5. Oosthuizen, A.M. & Inglesi-Lotz, R., 2022. "The impact of policy priority flexibility on the speed of renewable energy adoption," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 426-438.
    6. Bresciani, Stefano & Puertas, Rosa & Ferraris, Alberto & Santoro, Gabriele, 2021. "Innovation, environmental sustainability and economic development: DEA-Bootstrap and multilevel analysis to compare two regions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Eslam A. Hassanein & Nagwa Samak & Salwa Abdelaziz, 2024. "The synergetic effect of economic complexity and governance on quality of life: policy thresholds," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:22:p:2353-2365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.