IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v51y2019i51p5545-5558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How relative income affects work hours preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Schalembier
  • Brent Bleys
  • Luc Van Ootegem
  • Elsy Verhofstadt

Abstract

In this article, we look at explanations for why people want to change their working hours. We focus on the role of income and differentiate between the effect of household income, personal income and self-perceived relative income. Using Flemish data on 1435 workers, we perform binary logistic regressions in which we compare those who are over- or underemployed with those who are currently working their preferred number of hours. Our results show that the desire to work fewer hours is mostly related to a bad work–life balance, while the wish to increase working hours is associated with relative income rather than absolute income. Based on our findings we recommend governments to not only focus on increasing flexibility at the individual level but to also consider these positional effects by taking measures (e.g. decreasing the duration of the standard working week) at the population level.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Schalembier & Brent Bleys & Luc Van Ootegem & Elsy Verhofstadt, 2019. "How relative income affects work hours preferences," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(51), pages 5545-5558, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:51:y:2019:i:51:p:5545-5558
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1613512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2019.1613512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2019.1613512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:51:y:2019:i:51:p:5545-5558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.