IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v49y2017i16p1627-1636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic efficiency adjusted for risk preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Yeager
  • Michael R. Langemeier

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of risk preferences on cost and revenue efficiency for a sample of farms. Risk preference scores were used to measure risk aversion. Cost and revenue efficiency were estimated using traditional input and output measures, and then re-estimated including each farm’s risk preference score. Comparisons were made between farms with and without a change in efficiency when each farm’s risk preference was included in the analysis. As expected, risk preference plays an important role in explaining farm inefficiency. Failure to account for risk preferences overstates inefficiency, particularly for slightly risk averse and risk neutral farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Yeager & Michael R. Langemeier, 2017. "Economic efficiency adjusted for risk preferences," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(16), pages 1627-1636, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:16:p:1627-1636
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1223819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2016.1223819
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2016.1223819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John L. Dillon & J. R. Anderson, 1971. "Allocative Efficiency, Traditional Agriculture, and Risk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(1), pages 26-32.
    2. Rolf Fare & Shawna Grosskopf & William Weber, 2004. "The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15), pages 1731-1743.
    3. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Aliber, Michael, 1993. "An Analysis Of Economic Efficiency In Agriculture: A Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robbie Maris & Zack Dorner, 2021. "Cost Efficiency Analysis using Operating Profit Margin for the New Zealand Dairy Industry," Working Papers in Economics 21/04, University of Waikato.
    2. Ofori, Eric Makafui & Yeager, Elizabeth & Briggeman, Brian, "undated". "Agricultural Cooperative mergers and efficiency gains: An ex-ante analysis," 2020 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2020, Louisville, Kentucky 302323, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badunenko, Oleg & Fritsch, Michael & Stephan, Andreas, 2008. "Allocative efficiency measurement revisited--Do we really need input prices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1093-1109, September.
    2. H Fukuyama & W L Weber, 2009. "Estimating indirect allocative inefficiency and productivity change," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1594-1608, November.
    3. Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2010. "Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 189-198, July.
    4. Stefani, Gianluca & Gadanakis, Yiorgos & Lombardi, Ginevra Virginia & Tiberti, Marco, 2017. "The impact of financial leverage on farms capacity to react in market shocks," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261156, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Langemeier, Michael R. & DeLano, Fredrick D., 1999. "Characteristics Of Highly Efficient Farms," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35671, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. František STŘELEČEK & Radek ZDENĚK & Jana LOSOSOVÁ, 2011. "Influence of production change on return to scale," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 159-168.
    7. Gulati, Rachita & Kumar, Sunil, 2016. "Assessing the impact of the global financial crisis on the profit efficiency of Indian banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 167-181.
    8. Shoaib Alam Siddiqui & Ali Shaddady, 2023. "How Profit Efficient is Indian Life Insurance Industry: A DEA Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    9. Alexandre Momparler & Carlos Lassala & Domingo Ribeiro, 2013. "Efficiency in banking services: a comparative analysis of Internet-primary and branching banks in the US," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 641-663, December.
    10. Martin Fiszbein, 2022. "Agricultural Diversity, Structural Change, and Long-Run Development: Evidence from the United States," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-43, April.
    11. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, Anastasia I. & Mamatzakis, Emmanuel C., 2011. "Efficiency under quantile regression: What is the relationship with risk in the EU banking industry?," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 84-95, May.
    12. Chaffai, Mohamed & Dietsch, Michel, 2015. "Modelling and measuring business risk and the resiliency of retail banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 173-182.
    13. Chen, Ku-Hsieh, 2012. "Incorporating risk input into the analysis of bank productivity: Application to the Taiwanese banking industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1911-1927.
    14. Parman, Bryon & Featherstone, Allen & Coffey, Brian, 2015. "Is Efficiency Analysis All There Is With Data Envelopment Analysis," Working Papers 197532, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Rolf Färe & Xinju He & Sungko Li & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2019. "A Unifying Framework for Farrell Profit Efficiency Measurement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 183-197, January.
    16. Mugera, Amin W. & Langemeier, Michael R., 2011. "Does Farm Size and Specialization Matter for Productive Efficiency? Results from Kansas," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 515-528, November.
    17. Besser, T. & Mann, S., 2015. "Which farm characteristics influence work satisfaction? An analysis of two agricultural systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 107-112.
    18. Strappazzon, Loris & Eigenraam, Mark & Wimalasuriya, Rukman & Stoneham, Gary, 2002. "Estimating Research Benefits When there is Input and Output Substitution: An Applied Analysis," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125167, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. S Blancard & J-P Boussemart & H Leleu, 2011. "Measuring potential gains from specialization under non-convex technologies," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(10), pages 1871-1880, October.
    20. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Doris Läpple & Bradford Barham & Emma Dillon, 2022. "An economic analysis of production efficiency: Evidence from Irish farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(2), pages 153-173, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:16:p:1627-1636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.