IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apmtfi/v15y2008i3p251-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedging Large Portfolios of Options in Discrete Time

Author

Listed:
  • B. Peeters
  • C. L. Dert
  • A. Lucas

Abstract

The problem studied is that of hedging a portfolio of options in discrete time where underlying security prices are driven by a combination of idiosyncratic and systematic risk factors. It is shown that despite the market incompleteness introduced by the discrete time assumption, large portfolios of options have a unique price and can be hedged without risk. The nature of the hedge portfolio in the limit of large portfolio size is substantially different from its continuous time counterpart. Instead of linearly hedging the total risk of each option separately, the correct portfolio hedge in discrete time eliminates linear as well as second and higher order exposures to the systematic risk factors only. The idiosyncratic risks need not be hedged, but disappear through diversification. Hedging portfolios of options in discrete time thus entails a trade-off between dynamic and cross-sectional hedging errors. Some computations are provided on the outcome of this trade-off in a discrete-time Black-Scholes world.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Peeters & C. L. Dert & A. Lucas, 2008. "Hedging Large Portfolios of Options in Discrete Time," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 251-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:15:y:2008:i:3:p:251-275
    DOI: 10.1080/13504860701718471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504860701718471
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504860701718471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Option hedging; discrete time; preference free valuation; hedging errors; cross-sectional hedging; static hedging; JEL Codes: G13; G12;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:15:y:2008:i:3:p:251-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.