IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v9y2002i11p715-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Production Subsidies and Import Tariffs under Different Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Aiello

Abstract

Both a tariff and a production subsidy can be used to protect the import competing industry. Yeh (1971) has shown that if the country is large, a tariff will be superior to a production subsidy, assuming that the level of support required for the import competing industry is not greater than the one needed when the optimum tariff is in operation. Maintaining the hypothesis that exporters do not react to importing country policies, the paper shows that tariffs and subsidies can always be ordered. Tariffs will remain superior to subsidies even if the support guaranteed to domestic producers exceeds that achieved under the optimum tariff. A tariff though is inferior to production subsidy only when the country wishes to produce a quantity significantly in excess of the optimum tariff production. However, this ranking is sensitive to the behaviour of trade partners. In fact, when foreign suppliers fix their export quantity at the free-trade equilibrium through whatever means, production subsidy is shown to be always superior to tariff.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Aiello, 2002. "Ranking Production Subsidies and Import Tariffs under Different Scenarios," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(11), pages 715-720.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:11:p:715-720
    DOI: 10.1080/13504850110112576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13504850110112576&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504850110112576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Anania & Mary Bohman, 1990. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1092.
    2. J. N. Bhagwati & T. N. Srinivasan, 1969. "Optimal Intervention to Achieve Non-Economic Objectives," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 36(1), pages 27-38.
    3. Giovanni Anania & Mary Bohman, 1988. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(3), pages 735-739.
    4. Bradley J. McDonald, 1990. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1087-1090.
    5. Andrew Schmitz & Dale Sigurdson & Otto Doering, 1988. "Domestic Farm Policy and the Gains from Trade: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(3), pages 740-740.
    6. Krishna, Pravin & Panagariya, Arvind, 2000. "A unification of second best results in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-257, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margolis, Michael & Shogren, Jason F., 2002. "Unprotected Resources and Voracious World Markets," Discussion Papers 10635, Resources for the Future.
    2. Krishna, Pravin & Bhagwati, Jagdish, 1997. "Necessarily welfare-enhancing customs unions with industrialization constraints: The Cooper-Massell-Johnson-Bhagwati conjecture," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 441-446, December.
    3. Panagariya, Arvind, 1990. "How should tariffs be structured?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 353, The World Bank.
    4. Jen-Yao Lee & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2018. "Foreign competition and optimal privatization with excess burden of taxation," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 189-204, October.
    5. P. J. Lloyd, 1973. "Optimal Intervention in a Distortion‐ridden Open Economy," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 49(3), pages 377-393, September.
    6. Hartmut Egger & Josef Falkinger, 2016. "Limited Consumer Attention in International Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 1096-1128, November.
    7. John Gilbert, 2009. "A 'Live' Version of the HOS Model with Interventions," Working Papers 200905, Utah State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
    8. Panagariya, Arvind, 2000. "Evaluating the case for export subsidies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2276, The World Bank.
    9. Yew-Kwang Ng, 2017. "Towards a Theory of Third-Best," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 155-166, May.
    10. Anni Huhtala & Eva Samakovlis, 2002. "Does International Harmonization of Environmental Policy Instruments Make Economic Sense?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 21(3), pages 259-284, March.
    11. Dinopoulos, Elias & Livanis, Grigorios & West, Carol, 2010. "Country of Origin Labeling (C.O.O.L.): How cool is it?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 575-589, October.
    12. Defever,Fabrice Fernand & Reyes,Jose Daniel & Riano,Alejandro & Varela,Gonzalo J., 2017. "All these worlds are yours, except India : the effectiveness of export subsidies in Nepal," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8009, The World Bank.
    13. Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona Paulsen & Saggi, Kamal & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2024. "The National Security Exception at the WTO: should it just be a matter of when members can avail of it? What about how?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121352, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Nicholas Gruen, 2016. "When Only the Second Best Will Do: Economic Reform and Intra-Industry Trade in Australia's Automotive Industry," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(4), pages 316-331, December.
    15. Sarbajit Chaudhuri, 2016. "Trade Unionism and Welfare Consequences of Trade and Investment Reforms in A Developing Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 152-171, February.
    16. Krishna, Pravin & Panagariya, Arvind, 2000. "A unification of second best results in international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-257, December.
    17. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Landis, Florian, 2014. "Economics of transiting to renewable energy in Morocco : a general equilibrium analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6940, The World Bank.
    18. Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "Preferential Trading and Welfare: The Small-Union Case Revisited," International Trade 0308009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Qiu, Larry D. & Spencer, Barbara J., 2002. "Keiretsu and relationship-specific investment: implications for market-opening trade policy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 49-79, October.
    20. Kox, Henk L. M. & Van der Tak, Casper M., 1996. "Non-transboundary pollution and the efficiency of international environmental co-operation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 247-259, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:11:p:715-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.