IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v32y2025i4p518-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Do it myself” or “do it for me”? : focusing on behavioural and needs aspects of investment decision among retirement plan participants

Author

Listed:
  • HanNa Lim
  • Richard Stebbins
  • Travis Sholin

Abstract

Using primary data from 388 employer-sponsored retirement plan participants, this study examines factors related to the decision between self-directed and pre-determined investment options (i.e. target date funds and risk-based portfolios). Results from binary and multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that those with unusual needs such as an early retirement and longer life expectancy were more likely to choose self-directed investment option over pre-determined investment options. However, those with greater loss aversion were more likely to choose target date funds rather than making active investment decisions. The findings of this study help our understanding of retirement plan participants’ investment portfolio choice and provide policy implications on default investment options in employer-sponsored retirement plans.

Suggested Citation

  • HanNa Lim & Richard Stebbins & Travis Sholin, 2025. "“Do it myself” or “do it for me”? : focusing on behavioural and needs aspects of investment decision among retirement plan participants," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 518-522, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:518-522
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2023.2276069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2023.2276069
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2023.2276069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:518-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.