IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v31y2024i21p2312-2316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate culture and product innovation: evidence from a firm survey

Author

Listed:
  • Shoko Haneda
  • Arito Ono

Abstract

Despite the recognition that the determinants of exploratory and exploitative innovation differ, whether and how corporate culture affects exploratory and exploitative innovation has not been examined much in the literature. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature and empirically examines the relationship between corporate culture and product innovation using a unique survey of Japanese firms. From the survey, we identify four types of corporate culture in the Competing Values Framework and two types of product innovations (product novelty): explorative innovations (new-to-market products) and exploitative innovations (new-to-firm products). We employ a bivariate probit model to examine the effect of corporate culture on making new-to-market products and new-to-firm products. We find that firms that selected the words ”market impact” and ”creativity”, both of which represent a Create-oriented culture, to describe their corporate culture in the survey are more likely to introduce new-to-market products. In contrast, firms that selected ”bottom-up approach”, which represents a Collaborate-oriented culture, have a higher likelihood of introducing new-to-firm products. The results suggest that the link between corporate culture and product innovation depends on whether a firm pursues explorative or exploitative innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoko Haneda & Arito Ono, 2024. "Corporate culture and product innovation: evidence from a firm survey," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(21), pages 2312-2316, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:21:p:2312-2316
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2023.2227411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2023.2227411
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2023.2227411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:21:p:2312-2316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.