IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v31y2024i20p2219-2222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, risk aversion, and the “COVID” grading option in a principles of economics course

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Trost
  • Jadrian Wooten

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the United States, colleges and universities faced the challenge of completing the academic term. Many institutions offered students the option of a ‘credit/no credit’ grading system, which wouldn’t affect their GPA. In this study, we examine which student characteristics are correlated with the decision to choose this grading option over a traditional letter grade. Our findings show that female students, particularly those with lower course grades, were more likely to opt for the ‘credit/no credit’ option than male students. This aligns with previous research indicating that female students tend to be more risk-averse, particularly in economics courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Trost & Jadrian Wooten, 2024. "Gender, risk aversion, and the “COVID” grading option in a principles of economics course," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(20), pages 2219-2222, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:20:p:2219-2222
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2023.2212960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2023.2212960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2023.2212960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:20:p:2219-2222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.