IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v30y2023i2p136-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting industrial designs: further IP protection for US start-ups?

Author

Listed:
  • Bernadette Power
  • Gavin C. Reid

Abstract

This article examines the determinants of adoption of industrial designs, for intellectual property (IP) protection, in a large sample of US start-ups. While patents and copyrights are widely analysed as ways of protecting proprietary knowledge in large firms, they are expensive forms of IP protection, both to create and to protect. For start-ups, cheaper and simpler methods have greater attraction, of which industrial design protection is an example. The article builds and tests an applied econometric model of industrial design adoption, using the longitudinal Kauffman Firm Survey, 2008–2012. The model is based on a microeconomic managerial utility theory of the firm, implemented within a random utility framework, leading to an estimable econometric model which takes the form of a binary probit with random effects. This model is run on an unbalanced panel sample of nearly nine thousand observations. It finds that expenditure on R&D plays a powerful role in the design adoption process. Incorporation and owner-managers’ injection of equity also play a positive and significant part in design adoption. These three influences are all part of the commitment that owner-managers bring to their start-ups. Sales directed to products rather than services also have positive effects on industrial design adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernadette Power & Gavin C. Reid, 2023. "Adopting industrial designs: further IP protection for US start-ups?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 136-140, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:2:p:136-140
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.1980190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2021.1980190
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2021.1980190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:2:p:136-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.