IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v30y2023i13p1784-1792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Where did you get that from? Gender differences in bargaining for gifts and bought goods

Author

Listed:
  • David Matthäus
  • Peter Schäfer

Abstract

Do men or women bargain more successfully? Existing evidence suggests that men achieve higher economic outcomes from bargaining than women – but the gap is context-specific. The literature predominantly studies one-shot bargaining games in the laboratory, situations in which communication is impossible, or situations in which persons follow a bargaining protocol. In this study, we use data from a TV show to study whether men or women bargain more successfully for trade deals in the field, without a strict protocol, and with free communication. We find that men and women bargain, on average, equally successfully. However, we find that the bargaining outcomes achieved by female sellers depend on the origin of an object. Specifically, women realize higher outcomes for bought objects than for objects they obtained for free, whereas men realize similar outcomes for bought and free objects. In sum, we find evidence that gender differences observed in the laboratory do not necessarily persist in bargaining situations in other settings and can even be inverted, dependent on the framing of the bargaining situation.

Suggested Citation

  • David Matthäus & Peter Schäfer, 2023. "Where did you get that from? Gender differences in bargaining for gifts and bought goods," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(13), pages 1784-1792, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:13:p:1784-1792
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2083057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2083057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2022.2083057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:13:p:1784-1792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.