IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v24y2017i7p481-484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminization of labour and profit rates: evidence from OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Adem Y. Elveren
  • Christa Marr
  • Yvonne Renard

Abstract

The article examines the effect of the feminization of labour on profit rates and capacity utilization by employing an indirect and two-stage least squares models for 21 OECD countries during the 1970–2008 period. Findings show that higher women’s labour force participation rates and gender wage gap lead to higher profit rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Adem Y. Elveren & Christa Marr & Yvonne Renard, 2017. "Feminization of labour and profit rates: evidence from OECD countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 481-484, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:7:p:481-484
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1203057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2016.1203057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2016.1203057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Flores Garrido, 2020. "Precarity From a Feminist Perspective: A Note on Three Elements for the Political Struggle," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 582-590, September.
    2. Daniel Ossa, 2024. "Gender Wage Gap, Wage-Productivity Decoupling, and the Rate of Profit," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 51-69, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:7:p:481-484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.