IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v79y2025i1p91-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Method Data Science Pipeline for Analyzing Police Service

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Haensch
  • Daanika Gordon
  • Karin Knudson
  • Justina Cheng

Abstract

Despite the fact that most police departments in the U.S. serve jurisdictions with fewer than 10,000 residents, policing practices in small towns are understudied. This is due in part to data limitations and technological barriers that exist in the small-town context. In this article we focus on one small town police department in New England with a history of misconduct, and develop a comprehensive data science pipeline that addresses the stages from design and collection to reporting. We present the reader with specific tools in the open-source Python ecosystem for replicating this pipeline. Once these data are processed, we perform two statistical analyses in an attempt to better understand the provisions of service by the small-town police department of focus. First, we perform ecological inference to estimate the rate at which residents are placing calls for service. Second, we model wait times using a negative binomal regression model to account for overdispersion in the data. We discuss data and model limitations arising through the pipeline creation and analysis process.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Haensch & Daanika Gordon & Karin Knudson & Justina Cheng, 2025. "A Multi-Method Data Science Pipeline for Analyzing Police Service," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 91-101, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:79:y:2025:i:1:p:91-101
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2374275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2024.2374275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2024.2374275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:79:y:2025:i:1:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.